London Orbit vs Eiffel Tower

If you design buildings for a living you spend a lot of time thinking about what makes a good building. Which buildings do people most enjoy being in ? Which buildings are people most proud of ? Which buildings use materials most efficiently ? I remember an ex-colleague who was a structural engineer who liked to argue that the best buildings had a unique silhouette. So by that measure these are two strong contenders the ArcelorMittal London Orbit in the Olympic Park in Stratford, London in England vs the Eiffel Tower on the Champs du Mars in Paris, France.

The Eiffel Tower is the oldest. It was built for the 1889 World’s Fair in Paris. Eiffel’s company developed the design which they submitted to a competition. They won and were granted 1.5 million francs to construct it (less than a quarter of the estimated cost). He paid the remainder of the construction cost himself in return for the proceeds from it’s receipts for the first twenty years of its operation.

The ArcelorMittal Orbit is much more recent. It was built for the 2012 Olympics in London. A competition was run for an Olympic Tower. The winning design was by Anish Kapoor (a sculptor) and Cecil Balmond (an engineer at Arup). The London Development Agency provided £3.1m funding (less than a sixth of the estimated cost). The remainder was paid by ArcelorMittal (a steel company) who constructed the tower.

Each tower has two observation decks. They also have their own distinctive features. The Eiffel Tower is one of only two known buildings in the world to have an elevator on an incline (the other is in the town hall in Hannover, Germany). The ArcelorMittal Orbit has what is believed to be the longest tunnel slide in the world which is 178m long.

The Eiffel Tower is 330m tall. Before it was built the tallest free-standing structure in the world was the Washington Monument which is 169m high. It is constructed of wrought iron. Wrought iron was a precursor to steel, it has some strength in tension but is anisotropic (formed in layers) and the failure stress is very variable. The Eiffel Tower’s shape is similar to a pyramid, which is a very efficient shape adorned with pediments and the arch for aesthetic flourishes. It is believed to have been analysed using integrals and graphic analysis carried out by hand. The structure weighs 7,300 tonnes which is equivalent to 22 tonnes/m height. The additional elements such as lifts, shops and antennae bring the total weight to 10,100 tonnes.

The London Orbit is 114m tall built of steel. The shape was designed to use “instabilities as stabilities”. It would not have been possible to build using wrought iron as the reliable strength is lower than modern steel. The required quantities of materials could not have been reasonably calculated without modern advances in computer analysis. The overall shape is irregular and unbalanced which requires more structural materials for a given height. The structures has approximately 2,000 tonnes of steel, which is equivalent to 17.5 tonnes/m height. Some crude approximations suggest that this could have been reduced by about half if a more efficient shape had been chosen.

structural engineer buildings Eiffel Tower London Orbit structural engineer buildings Eiffel Tower London Orbit structural engineer buildings Eiffel Tower London Orbit structural engineer buildings Eiffel Tower London Orbit structural engineer buildings Eiffel Tower London Orbit structural engineer buildings Eiffel Tower London Orbit structural engineer buildings Eiffel Tower London Orbit structural engineer buildings Eiffel Tower London Orbit structural engineer buildings Eiffel Tower London Orbit structural engineer buildings Eiffel Tower London Orbit structural engineer buildings Eiffel Tower London Orbit structural engineer buildings Eiffel Tower London Orbit structural engineer buildings Eiffel Tower London Orbit

Structural Engineering Blogs

If you’re interested in structural engineering, you may have found that it’s not the easiest profession to learn about. There are a few sources – there are some organisations that are trying to raise its profile, there are a few good books and some youtube videos.

I found the most helpful was talking to a family friend who was a structural engineer about what it was like. He had trained as both an architect and engineer, worked for a famous company, and then was lecturing and inspiring others by teaching creativity and good design.

But for those who don’t know any structural engineers, I think personal blogs are a good place to start. I’ve found blogging to be a lot harder than it looks, so these people are obviously very passionate about what they do to have been so persistent in writing about it. I hope they open up another world for you.

The Happy Pontist – I love this blog. HP’s infectious enthusiasm is backed up by an incredible depth of knowledge. Structural engineering is designing how things stand up, which could be for anything, but the particular fun with bridges is that the structure is on display (unlike most buildings for example). Very difficult to pick favourites from amongst the 750+ posts but would recommend this one on one of Robert Maillart’s gem’s in Switzerland, and this piece of one of Calatrava’s bridges that broke the mould.

My Passion for Structural Engineering – was a popular blog written by Waseem Rana that has now been taken down. I was inspired by the layout he used when I was setting up my own blog.

Civil Engineering Gyan – I enjoyed reading this blog, which is co-authored by Rakshita Nagayach an Indian civil engineer by training, and a prolific blogger (this is just one of hers). She writes on a wide range of topics related to engineering but I particularly enjoyed this post about great engineers. It’s nice to hear a few names outside the British and American ones I’ve heard of elsewhere.

Being Brunel – This blog inspired me to start my own blog but has now been taken down.

Structural Madness – If you’re lucky as an engineer you get to work at the cutting edge of what is possible, I think that is what co-authors Jinal Doshi and Darshan Pala mean by the name of their blog Structural Madness. For example, some people may have considered it madness when the the Burj Khalifa smashed the world record for tallest building by 300m; but it has proven to be a success. This blog, started when they were both in Grad School in the US is the top result when searching for structural engineering blogs. They tackle difficult concepts but use lots of pictures to make this an accessible way to learn about structural engineering.

If you liked this blog post, you might also enjoy my post about good books about structural engineering or go back to the homepage to see other options.

structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs structural engineering blogs